INDIANAPOLIS — One team. Two MVP candidates. One very clear message from the Indiana Fever.
The Fever have officially launched their “MVP²” campaign, putting Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell in the spotlight as the franchise makes its case for two MVP-caliber seasons coming from the same team.
The campaign, promoted by the Fever on social media, directs fans to FeverMVP2026.com for everything surrounding the MVP² push.
And the timing is no coincidence.
Mitchell has been putting together one of the most impressive scoring stretches in WNBA history, while Clark remains one of the league’s most recognizable and productive young stars.
The Fever’s message is simple:
Why settle for one MVP season when Indiana can have two?
What Is “MVP²”?
The concept is straightforward: two players, one team, two MVP-level campaigns.
Rather than choosing between Clark and Mitchell, Indiana is asking fans to consider what both players have contributed to the Fever.
Mitchell’s case has been fueled by historic scoring consistency. Clark’s case centers on her all-around offensive impact, playmaking and ability to influence the game in multiple ways.
Together, they form the centerpiece of Indiana’s backcourt.
Kelsey Mitchell’s Historic Scoring Run
Mitchell has provided one of the biggest statistical arguments behind the Fever’s campaign.
She became the first player in WNBA history to score 20 or more points in 21 consecutive games, extending a scoring streak that became one of the defining individual accomplishments of the 2026 regular season.
That consistency has made Mitchell a major part of Indiana’s offensive identity.
The veteran guard also earned August Eastern Conference Player of the Month honors after averaging 20.6 points per game during the month.
Caitlin Clark’s MVP Case
Clark’s MVP campaign comes from a different statistical profile.
Her value isn’t limited to scoring. Clark’s ability to create shots, distribute the basketball and generate offense has made her one of the league’s most impactful players when healthy.
The Fever have increasingly leaned into the idea that Clark and Mitchell don’t necessarily have to compete for the spotlight.
They can share it.
The “MVP²” Question
The WNBA MVP award ultimately goes to one player, but Indiana’s campaign creates a different conversation:
Can two players from the same team both have legitimate MVP cases?
That’s exactly what makes the Fever’s campaign interesting.
Clark and Mitchell don’t simply represent two individual stars. They represent two different ways of influencing a basketball game.
And Indiana is now putting that argument directly in front of the basketball world.
One team. Two MVP seasons.
The Fever are calling it MVP².
The Debate
If you had to choose one player for MVP, who gets your vote?
Caitlin Clark or Kelsey Mitchell?
Or does Indiana’s MVP² argument make the case that both deserve serious consideration?
